I have never been a smoker, so I can't really relate to the needs smokers have. However, I can relate to how uncomfortable a smoky pub can get for a non-smoker. I've experienced having to get out because your lungs hurt and your eyes are watering. I don't like waking up the next morning and smelling smoke from my pillow (and lets not even talk about the previous evening's clothes).
So I've been in favour of the ban on smoking in all work places since it was first mentioned over a year ago. Actually I was in favour of it before that, but I'd never have thought Ireland would be the first EU country to implement it.
There has been a lot of resistance. Publicans said their businesses will go down the tubes. People who stock vending machines will be out on the street. Air conditioning installers will have to pack their bags (I don't get this one - surely most of the demand for air conditioning is in office buildings).
But it seems support for the ban is on the rise. Apparently 70% of the public is in favour, as are over 40% of smokers. Publicans are now saying that they could see rise in business from non-smokers (well, duh). And according to this web poll, 86% are currently lookign forward to the ban.
I find it really interesting to see how attitudes have changed. It remains to see how it will work out in practice, but two thirds of the population are non-smokers, so why should a minority of smokers be allowed to force everyone endure a smoky atmosphere?
I respect a smoker's right to light up, but only if they respect my right not to breathe the smoke they exhale.
So I've been in favour of the ban on smoking in all work places since it was first mentioned over a year ago. Actually I was in favour of it before that, but I'd never have thought Ireland would be the first EU country to implement it.
There has been a lot of resistance. Publicans said their businesses will go down the tubes. People who stock vending machines will be out on the street. Air conditioning installers will have to pack their bags (I don't get this one - surely most of the demand for air conditioning is in office buildings).
But it seems support for the ban is on the rise. Apparently 70% of the public is in favour, as are over 40% of smokers. Publicans are now saying that they could see rise in business from non-smokers (well, duh). And according to this web poll, 86% are currently lookign forward to the ban.
I find it really interesting to see how attitudes have changed. It remains to see how it will work out in practice, but two thirds of the population are non-smokers, so why should a minority of smokers be allowed to force everyone endure a smoky atmosphere?
I respect a smoker's right to light up, but only if they respect my right not to breathe the smoke they exhale.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 07:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 08:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 08:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 08:04 am (UTC)Why is this? Are they not going to sell cigarettes in pubs at all anymore? If that is actually part of the law, then I can understand, but if it isn't, it surely isn't going to have that much effect.
I'm just curious. I'm also curious to see what would happen if, for instance, somebody just got out a pack of smokes in a pub, without lighting them up. I'd imagine the publicans would view it similarly to you getting out some of your own food instead of eating what they sell, although of course it is different. But the general pub-crowd might get quite worked up.
Oh, and another thing I'm wondering - is it smoking inside or on the premises? For instance, if you were in a hotel set in acres of land, do you have to trudge all the way out to the main gate or is standing in the grounds okay?
two thirds of the population are non-smokers, so why should a minority of smokers be allowed to force everyone endure a smoky atmosphere?
Believe it or not, as somebody with an extremely acute sense of smell, I can relate to this. I just wish there was a similar furore about banning people eating foods on public transport, for instance, people not bathing, etc etc.
Actually, I don't wish all that be banned. Just the foods on public transport, that makes me heave. The Tube "asks people" not to eat smelly foods, I was so pleased when I saw that.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 08:40 am (UTC)Employers may provide outdoor somking shelters, but aren't required to do so.
I don't see why there won't still be demand for cigarettes from vending machines. Just people can't smoke in the pub, doesn't mean they won't buy cigarettes for when they go outside. However, there is another law, which will cause them problems when it comes into effect. Retailers won't be allowed to display cigarette packets or any form of advertising. Cigarettes will have to be hidden behind the counter, and customers will have to ask if they have the desired brand. I'm not sure how this effects vending machines, but they won't be the glorious advertising spaces they currently are. I think there was a move to outlaw selling cigarettes by machine because the machine has no way of verifying the age of the purchaser.
But, given the proliferation of soft drink and sweet vending machines all over the place, I think the stockers should gradually find enough extra business to take up the slack.
Actually, there could a market for rebranding cigarette machines to sell nicotine gum and patches...
no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 10:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 12:16 pm (UTC)I have some PDFs at work I could email you if you don't find what you want there.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 10:00 pm (UTC)Employers may provide outdoor smoking shelters
Most already do this, don't they? In my experience, when they get annoyed at their front getting littered, and a gang of employees lurking about there looking seedy, they decide it's the cheaper option. Again, depending on them having the space.
Actually, there could a market for rebranding cigarette machines to sell nicotine gum and patches...
Gum maybe, but patches aren't something that you use at a variable rate. And of course, both of them are just another nicotine addiction to move onto, and thus defeat the point. Might as well start selling snuff again. Heh. Now there's something there might be a market in.
I think there was a move to outlaw selling cigarettes by machine because the machine has no way of verifying the age of the purchaser.
One of the local pubs in Innishannon got around this by putting the machine up ridiculously high (actually, I doubt this was the motivation, but you know...) Nothing like completely losing the respect of all the patrons in a pub by having to climb on a stool to use a vending machine.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 09:01 am (UTC)As regards the vending machines, it's basically down to the fact that if people can't smoke in pubs then they won't smoke as many when they're out drinking so there won't be the need to buy them in the pub 'cos they can't smoke them there anyway. With the proliferation of 24-hour shops if someone wants to smoke at home they can pick them up pretty easily at night, certainly in the cities and that's where the revenue is.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 09:14 am (UTC)I agree that cigarette vending machines will be less in demand. I suspect cigarettes will be generally. But to say it will put the vending machine operators out of business is daft. They might need less staff in the short term, but in every other area their business is booming.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-25 01:23 pm (UTC)